Thanks again to all users, GOTD and of course Softorbits. You've got a foundation I suggest you build upon it and then it would be worth the asking price.
If it were me, I'd bundle many of your products especially if you want to make claims that your software is on par with Adobe. I appreciate the opportunity to test the software, but I will be unistalling as many others have mentioned there are free products that simply do a better job. The Screenshots look much better than the actual product. When I visted the company website, your Batch Picture Resizer screenshots look nothing like what I have downloaded today. You also have several other products that could be bundled with this one to make it a more useful product. Overall: I give this a thumbs down for its lack of features, I think the company would do well to bundle this with a better picture viewer, better watermarking tool and enhance the GUI to make it easier to use. No auto adust, no left or right clockwise adjustment, not way to in effect enhance the quaility of the pictures as other software provides.
Not enough useful tools to make it competitive to even the free software. Have to purchase yet another product with adds to the overall size of your applcations which I had hoped would be an all in one tool.ħ.
If you need a professional looking watermark you'll need toī.) Use the built in tool, I recommend against this as the quality and ability to view it are so limited.Ĭ). There are plenty of free products already providing these features and more.Ħ. The ability to preview is extremely limited so your on a wing and a prayer.ĥ. The watermark feature is extremly limited and of poor quality actually one of the poorest quality watermarks I have seen in any software.Ĥ. Unless you are willing to give up your originals then you will not save space, but in fact will be adding as you need to make another folder to hold your newly resized images.ģ. You can resize but not revert with out quality loss as #47 also confirmed.Ģ.
The product leaves a small footprint and uses little resources.ġ. #47 Mike, Thank you, this is as I suspected but did want some additional feedback which you have done a great job in explaining.ģ.